Subsequent amendments and additions and of

Roselin67

Aensure the uniform interpretation and application of the law by the courts or is not currently the subject of an appeal in the interest of laws. In this case the condition regarding the existence of a pending case in the last level of jurisdiction the Bucharest Court of Appeal Second Criminal Section being vested in File no. with the resolution of the appeals declared by the Prosecutors Office attached to the Bucharest Court and the defendant FA against Criminal Sentence no. of May of the Bucharest Court First Criminal Section. At the same time the legal issue with which the supreme court was.

Referred has not yet received a solution through a prior decision or through Country Email List an appeal in the interest of the law nor is it the subject of such an appeal Address no. .C.III of January of the general prosecutor of the Prosecutors Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice. With regard to the connection between the referred legal issue and the substantive resolution of the appeal filed by the defendant FA it should be noted that by the Indictment no.




DP of March of the Prosecutors Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice DIICOT Bucharest Territorial Service the defendant was sent to court for committing three crimes of highrisk drug trafficking provided for by art. para. from Law no. republished with  a highrisk drug trafficking offense provided for by art. para. and from Law no. republished with the subsequent amendments and additions in a state of real contest essentially noting that on the dates of May and May he sold different quantities of cannabis drug of risk according to table no. III annex to Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions that.