Over time this scenario will culminate

zzam26

In this situation, to stay afloat, Segwit1x will have to change the PoW algorithm and become an altcoin. But even an increase in value during fork cannot be a salvation for Segwit1x, since miners will prefer to mine Segwit2x and stay in NYA. Additionally, Bitcoin Cash will continue to work. The realistic development of this scenario is quite high based on the support of the majority of Fork segwit2x miners as part of the NYA agreement. For speculators with serious capital, this is not the best option, since they will not be able to get thousand percent super profits for a couple of weeks. They prefer the victory of Bitcoin Cash. If miners choose Bitcoin Cash The absolute win option of Bitcoin Cash, the cryptocurrencies with the maximum hashrate network. Here, Segwit1x can only survive by subjecting DAA or PoW changes, with immediate hardforking. Also, the branch with 2MB blocks of Segwit2x stops working.

This scenario will most likely make miners' prospects get richer by 1000% per month, if invested in Bitcoin Cash in a timely manner. However, the fact that classic Bitcoin is still traded ten times more than Bitcoin Cash raises doubts about the realism of  Peru Mobile Number List such a development. Let's imagine: At the time of the fork, Bitcoin Cash loses significantly in price and traditional Bitcoin continues to trade at maximum peaks. So, large capitalists buy Bitcoin Cash for "pennies", while Bitcoin is sold at a high cost. Consequently, Bitcoin Cash prices rise sharply and Bitcoin falls. At the same time, the investment appeal of Bitcoin Cash is increasing, attracting more and more miners. Meanwhile, both forks – Segwit1x and Segwit2x – are losing popularity, and block production speed is dropping significantly. The result is that the existence of Segwit2x ceases because it cannot change the PoW method of complexity re-calculation, taking into account the NYA agreement.



Segwit1x continues to function as an altcoin under the name Bitcoin, changing PoW, which is already being supported by many community representatives, due to the greater centralization of mining. with the disappearance of classic Bitcoin and replaced by Bitcoin Cash, as a branch with a very long chain for a common hashrate. If the miners go another way It could be assumed that the described scenarios will not be productive, and both the Segwit1x and Segwit2x forks would work within the underlying idea, without hardforks. However, this development of events is seen as the least possible. Especially, compared to the previous options. What do we get as a result? Predicting what will happen in case of DAA changes to Segwit1x or Segwit2x code is quite difficult. However, only this long-term solution will allow Fork to preserve life and deprive Bitcoin Cash of its advantages. If Bitcoin Cash fails to collect the largest chain for a common Hashrate, the uncertainty of the situation will be prolonged. However, Add will allow you to continue functioning and, over time, take out all the miners.